The TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY driving irons offer golfers a unique option for longer iron play, blending advanced technology with versatility.
Having always preferred hybrids over long irons, I was skeptical about how these driving irons would perform. After testing them on the course and analysing the data, I think I may have been wrong!
WATCH THE FULL VIDEO...
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Review
The Tech
The P-UDI is a classic, thin driving iron designed for a penetrating, lower ball flight. The P-DHY, on the other hand, features a more substantial back, providing a look closer to a hybrid and promising extra forgiveness.
Both clubs incorporate familiar TaylorMade technologies like SpeedFoam Air and the Through-Slot Speed Pocket, along with tungsten weighting (up to 26 grams).
While both irons share similarities, the biggest difference lies in the CG (center of gravity) placement: the P-DHY has a lower CG, helping golfers launch the ball higher, whereas the P-UDI offers more of a mid-CG for a flatter, more piercing trajectory.
On-Course Performance
Testing both irons on the 17th tee at Stockport Golf Club, I encountered a tight, dangerous hole—an ideal scenario for these driving irons. I started with the thinner P-UDI, which offered a less forgiving look at address. Surprisingly, I was able to hit a clean, accurate shot down the fairway.
Next, I tried the P-DHY. With its hybrid-like profile, I felt more confident standing over the ball, and it delivered a similarly straight, easy-to-control shot. Both irons kept me in play off the tee, with the P-DHY landing further down the middle, thanks to its increased forgiveness.
As I continued testing, including on a tricky par-4 with a dogleg left, I found both clubs ideal for shots requiring around 190 yards of carry.
The DHY’s larger head gave me the confidence to swing with more power, and its higher launch angle provided the kind of forgiveness you expect from a hybrid.
The Data
After gathering data using Foresight technology, I found that the distances between the two clubs were nearly identical, with only a one-yard difference (the P-UDI edged out slightly in distance).
Ball speed was virtually the same for both irons, differing by just 0.1 mph. Spin rates also remained close, with the P-DHY producing slightly more spin. The DHY did have a marginally higher peak height and launch angle, which was expected due to its design.
Which Utility Iron Is Best for You?
Despite being a hybrid player, I found myself preferring the P-UDI for its clean feel at impact. When struck well, it delivered a crisp, satisfying shot, while the P-DHY provided a more consistent, forgiving performance.
The P-DHY was easier to hit and kept my shots straight down the middle more reliably. However, if you're looking for a driving iron with a lower, more penetrating ball flight—especially for links-style golf—the P-UDI is the better option.
That said, both irons exceeded my expectations. If you’ve convinced yourself that you can't hit long irons and need a hybrid, these driving irons are worth trying. The P-UDI provides surprising forgiveness for its size, while the P-DHY delivers consistent, easy-to-hit shots.
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Verdict
The TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY driving irons are fantastic options for golfers looking to add distance and precision without sacrificing forgiveness. Whether you're a fan of long irons or a hybrid user like me, these clubs offer impressive performance, combining advanced technology with shot versatility.
I highly recommend giving both a try—especially if you’re considering adding a driving iron to your bag. You might just be as pleasantly surprised as I was.
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Pros and Cons
If you enjoyed this, you may also like:
Adidas Codechaos 25 Golf Shoe Review
Callaway Adds Two New Apex Irons For 2024